Thursday, October 2, 2014

An extended sponsorship plea in the form of a blog

I've always quite enjoyed running, after a fashion. 

Nice little jog along the canal on a Sunday morning, there and back in the duration of Sunday Supplement, mmm, lovely, that. Maybe even put a whistle in your hand whilst running and become a ref for a while, mmm, that was lovely too, when I wasn't being sworn at.

Basically, I've enjoyed running as long as you can do it before your 'Motivational Songs' playlist finishes. So somewhere between twenty minutes and half an hour, then. Home before the final key-change of 'Livin on a Prayer'.

But organised running? Outside of school, when you were forced to do it? Sod that. That's for fanatics.

*dramatic music*

UNTIL NOW.

That's right, on the 19th October, I'll be running my first half-marathon in the form of the Great Birmingham Run. 13 miles, or just over 21 kilometres, for you modern folk. After being half-decent at running at school, I started to get back into it whilst I was in Canada, and found a free, lovely free gym that was free a few yards from my accommodation. And it was free.

Never been one for weights- can you tell? My arms hurt just typing- so thought I'd run on the treadmill. Then, on January 1st, I signed up for the half-marathon. By October, I'll be coasting it, I thought. By May, I was probably as fit as I'd ever been. Woah there, I need to slow down, I thought. If I'm going to ask for sponsorship to do this half-marathon, I need to suffer slightly. If people see me out running every day and think I might even end up finishing
it comfortably, they won't sponsor me.

People like to see a bit of pain.

And so, thankfully, in around June, my knee completely packed in. Absolute agony for ages and ages. Bought a knee support, still agony. Gave up the running. That's the end of that.

Then I remembered this run thing I'd signed up to. Uh-oh. And, more pertinently, the 'warm-up' for it in the form of the Worcester 10k- my first 10k. Despite all evidence to the contrary, I convinced myself my knee was recovering and sweated my way round the course, in a fairly decent time. Couldn't walk for the next day, mind, but lots of great sportsmen have knee problems. Ledley King, Jamie Redknapp, Dele Adebola.

So, there you have it. If you were worried that I might actually enjoy this run, then think of me and the knee, and smile warmly at the thought of me in agony as the run drags into its second hour.

Onto the second part of this blog... the money part.

The charity I'm running for is called Winston's Wish, the leading charity for bereaved children in the UK. For those unsure why, I lost my father when I was 17, something which I've written about extensively before, notably here. 

The charity- named after a bear called Winston- provides all-round support and also residential weekends, for when it all gets a bit much. 'Residential weekends' sounds much more worthwhile than what I did, which was to go and see Birmingham play Stoke City. (1-0, Zigic 90+1).

Aside from the fact that it's an important charity, if I do find myself struggling with about half an hour to go, then with your donations in mind, there's no way I won't finish the run.

https://www.justgiving.com/EdHiggs/

Thanks.

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Ten reasons why this is ALREADY the best World Cup ever

I have a confession to make: I've never really loved a World Cup.

I don't have a favourite one that I can turn to on YouTube in my hour of need, because, essentially, the ones in my lifetime have been a bit rubbish. I'm only just noticing it now, but they have been rubbish.

That's not to say that I don't love the World Cup. There's a difference between loving 'a World Cup' and loving 'the World Cup', and I've found myself unfailingly in the latter category, whereas most football fans would probably put themselves with some form of overlap, usually with a nod to Italia '90.

No, I love the World Cup with all my heart. I love the politics, the history, the iconic commentary and the grainy clips, which are undoubtedly special. I love it so much that I sat through a BBC Three clip show presented by Ollie Murs and Rio Ferdinand not so long ago.

Now, however, five days into the 2014 World Cup, to paraphrase Robbie Williams, I'm loving a World Cup instead.

There's no doubt in my mind that we'll look back on this one as an utterly brilliant World Cup, probably the best ever. There have been twenty including this one, so that's quite a pedestal that I'm erecting for a competition that is still in its infancy.

But, just by way of a brief comparison, if we run through the recent ones...

2010 was plagued by negative football, there was barely one memorable match, the final was rubbish, and England were horrible.

I'd always tried to convince myself that I loved 2006, but if you look beyond the amazing Germany-Italy semi final, there weren't too many great games, and a lot were decided on penalties. Oh, and England were horrible.

2002 sounded like a great idea at the time, but the early mornings soon got tiresome, and we came perilously close to a Turkey v South Korea final.

This is getting beyond my realm of remembrance, but nobody seems to really speak of 1998 as a great World Cup. The iconic moments seem to be few and far between, and were it not for England v Argentina, and Bergkamp's semi final goal, I'm not sure I'd recall anything special about it from the clip shows I've watched.

England didn't qualify in 1994.


Everyone in England talks about Italia 90 with mythical status, but the rest of the world seems to see it as characterised by negative, dour, football, and with its fair share of cheating.

It seems you could make a case for 1986. Maradona was special, and a World Cup needs special. Put it on the maybe pile.

I won't go back any further, but England didn't qualify in 1978 or 1974, and then once you're into the 1960s the competition descends into farce, with teams like England winning it.

This World Cup, meanwhile, has all the ingredients. It has had plenty of goals, and enough great matches to satisfy that particular quota. The thing which all sports writers now seem to love, the 'narrative', will come later, always through some way in hindsight.

We didn't realise it at the time, but the narrative of the 2010 World Cup seemed to be one of teams prospering because of the dark arts: Suarez destroying the hopes of a young, emerging football continent; a final in which Holland forgot their principles; and too many teams hoping to get through by keeping it tight. Most, like England, got found out, but there'd always be a few that slipped through the net, and so it left a bitter taste for me.

The narrative of the 2006 World Cup was that of Italy triumphing against the backdrop of calciopoli, and European nations proving themselves vastly superior, and 1998, perhaps most poetically of all, saw France discover itself as a multicultural nation, with their winning side a fantastic assortment of all that makes a tolerant nation great.

I don't know what the 'narrative' of this World Cup will be, but I'd hazard a guess that we'll look back and see a 'victory' for teams who want to score goals, who load their team with attacking midfielders with just one 'water-carrier' type. I think it'll be characterised by a different sort of attacking to that of Spain- they'll go home at the group stage in all likelihood, tiki-taka will be dead, and we'll see a return to a more direct style of attacking football, sweeping cross-field passes, shooting on sight and the like. Of course, if Brazil win, the narrative will probably become the unifying force of football, as imposed by FIFA, which might be nice in some ways, but rather nauseating in others.

Anyway, that introduction has turned out more lengthy than I'd hoped, but here's ten reasons why this World Cup is already the best ever:

1) Goals. We've seen one bad match, Iran v Nigeria, with a vague nod to Mexico v Cameroon, which wasn't great, and those two games had one goal between them. Goals are fun.

2) Coverage. The coverage from ITV or BBC really hasn't been bad at all. People love to hate ITV's coverage, but we are ever so lucky, really. Try living abroad. When the coverage has been bad, it's been bad in a way we can all laugh at, like Jonathan Pearce's goal-line technology meltdown, or Fabio Cannavaro's hair.

3) Goal-line technology. It won't help Frank Lampard or Hans Tilkowski, the 1966 West Germany keeper, but FIFA are a stubborn bunch, and we should be grateful it's finally come in at last. I thoroughly enjoyed the first few games when the ball hammered into the back of the net and we got a look at it anyway.

4) Timezones. Football is better when it's in a crazy timezone. That's science. South Africa was the same as us and Germany was an hour in front, so it didn't feel that special, Japan and Korea had a decent novelty value, but this is the perfect timezone.

5) Thierry Henry's knitwear collection

6) England. We've finally got a team we can love. I've never failed to support England, but I found it difficult to persuade others of the merits of supporting the sides of 2006 and 2010, the brats that they were. Now, however, many of them come across as humble and decent and aware that they're lucky in life. Take Danny Sturridge's visit to that Liverpool primary school- find it on YouTube, you'll probably cry. We may go out after the Costa Rica game- in fact I think we probably will- but I'd much rather play three good games like the Italy game than grind our way to the knockout stages. We were never going to win it, so let's have some fun and absolutely murder everyone in Euro 2016.
7) Social media. You may have noticed there's been a few tweets running through this piece. I have to watch a lot of games on my own- most, in fact- and this little online community has lessened the blow of a first World Cup without my dad.

8) Honduras. They were ace, weren't they? No? Didn't like them? That's the World Cup, you've got to have a bit of rough and smooth. I found them thoroughly entertaining.

9) The knockout rounds start now. With only one draw at time of writing, a lot of teams are on an absolute knife-edge. I fancy we might see a few teams already having gone home by the weekend. Please god, just don't let it be England.

10) We've still got 50 games to go!





Monday, March 24, 2014

The Loneliness of the Long Distance Bluenose

Last season was the first season since the late 1990s that I didn’t have a season ticket in any capacity at Birmingham City Football Club. This was mostly down to my knowledge that I’d be going abroad, and I didn’t back myself to go ‘cold turkey’ in America. Therefore, safe in the knowledge that we were about to enter our darkest patch since I began supporting Blues, I relinquished my grip on Blues, if not emotionally, then tangibly, and I picked and I chose matches, attending around a dozen games, in an attempt to wean myself off football before the Big Move. 

When I think about it, actually going to our home games would probably have been more of a repellent. Anyway, did my coping strategy work? As this blog details, did it b*gger…

***
Just because I feel like the first bloke in the world wouldn't make me bawl. No, it's sometimes when I stand there feeling like the last man in the world that I don't feel so good. I feel like the last man in the world because I think that all those three hundred sleepers behind me are dead.
Alan Sillitoe, "The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner"

It's an odd phenomenon, being an expatriated fan of a team with little or no foreign fanbase, and very little TV coverage in the UK, let alone Canada. You’re forced to rely on social media, tiny snippets of highlights, and everyone else’s opinions. My view of the Blues this season has been a little bit like the horse designed by committee, which is to say, it resembles a camel: misshapen, bumpy, and full of piss.

Despite social media, you still feel like you’re the last one to find things out, especially on a match day. You wake up with a stinking hangover on a Saturday morning and the team has often already been announced. Sounds like nothing, but with our turnover of players this season, you try and work out who these kids are and what position they play. 

You feel like you’re the last man in the world. Everyone else knows what's happened, everyone else has been through the emotions and the coping mechanisms, and now it’s your turn. Far from a pioneer, just the last man in the world. 

Very rarely my emotions over football stretch into the next day. They used to, but once we reached the panacea of the Carling Cup final, it felt like to complain and kick your heels for the entirety of Sunday as well as Saturday would be churlish. Even so, when you’re in England, by 5pm, win or lose, you know you’ve only got around 6 or 7 hours before you can go to bed and forget the whole business. When we lose, my day has only just begun, and I’m left moaning my way into the Canadian evening, whilst everyone else is fast asleep. No, it’s then I feel like the last man in the world, and I don't feel so good.

Time zones are, in conclusion, a terrible thing. Tomorrow is our biggest match for two or three years, and I’ll be in a lecture, owing to us being four hours behind the UK, and the University of Toronto not particularly likely to stop for Millwall vs Blues. I already know that I won’t be able to concentrate one iota of my energy into discussing whatever book is supposed to have been read for tomorrow, and instead, I’ll be dedicating it to trying to stop my face from twisting into various horrendous contortions when the videprinter brings the news.

When in England, I can always pick up the phone and use my Great Uncle Mick as a sounding-board for sorrows or joys. Therapy. Any football fan will identify with that, it’s why phone-ins exist. Now? Who are you supposed to talk to? Support structures are obviously in place for International Students, but I don't think 'Lee Clark's team selections' have their own specialists. So, I talk, expletive-laden, to myself, most often. Or I just make weird whinnying noises, frustrated and fed-up in the knowledge that words about Birmingham City to your average Canadian make probably less sense than impersonating a horse. Which means I might be able to get away with said whinnying in tomorrow’s lecture. Probably.
 
Spreading the gospel, via the medium of a scarf
It’s why when somebody takes an interest, everything comes spilling out. Before class today, everyone was talking about the World Cup. My Mexican Spanish teacher made the fatal mistake of asking which was my domestic team. Roughly three and a half months of information that I’d stored up came flowing out, about Carson Yeung, fears of relegation, the cup, Clark, anything. Just a stream of consciousness, not unlike this blog. I wanted engagement.

Even more extreme is what happens when you see some form of English football merchandise. I’m not talking Arsenal or Man Utd, cos they could be of any nationality, but when you see an old fella walking round Toronto with a Grimsby Town tracksuit top, or a Sheffield United hat, you just can’t stop yourself from talking to them.
Yeah, what they said.

Which brings me to what happened when I encountered a bloke down by the harbour-front wearing a Blues shirt. I’ve already recounted this tale on this very blog, but it warrants repetition:

"I've really missed going down the Blues this year. Yes, we're terrible, but it's always been a struggle supporting us, so that wouldn't really affect my attendance. It's been the little things, like sitting down next to someone you barely know and saying 'Oryte mate, down't fancy us much today, do ya?'

So imagine my surprise, at the start of September, walking round the affluent docks of Toronto, when I spotted a flash of Royal Blue and White. It couldn't, could it? Could this be the solution to my footballing homesickness? Someone to discuss Lee Novak with?

First, I had to make absolutely sure. No-one wants to be accused of being a Birmingham City fan, falsely or otherwise, especially in front of a crowd of people, probably on holiday. So I broke from my friends, and did a fast walk, went past the Bluenose, and checked back with a quick jerk of the neck. It confirmed what I already knew. 

Make no mistake, I'm a sad bastard, and I know a shirt from 2004-05 when I see one. I could, obviously, have ignored him, and carried on with my life. But to recognise your tea's shirt, in a foreign land, and ignore it? Not in my name.

'Oy mate, you a Blues fan?'
'What? Me? Who? Where? Excuse me?'- Shit, he had a Scandinavian accent. This hasn't been the best start.
'You! Blues fan! Your shirt! Are you a Blues fan? Do you ever go? Strange, you don't expect to find many Blues fans out here, what do you reckon to Clark, think he'll turn it around? Where do you normall-'
'The shirt? Err, I... No... I've never been to Birmingham. I've never been to a game, I'm Norwegian. I just have the shirt. Sorry'. 

And with that, he hurried off".

The lonely desperation that I felt when I was slapped down by this imposter in a royal blue jersey was severe. And that's as close as I've got to another Blues fan since being in Canada.


Our fate will be sealed, one way or another, whilst I’m on holiday in New York. I think the last round of games is an early kick-off, so once more, I'll wake up feeling like ol' Smith, the creation of Sillitoe, like the last man in the world. Will we hurtle towards the third division for the first time in my conscious Blues-supporting lifetime? If we do stay up, and you listen carefully, you may be able to hear the faint echoes of a horse whinny resonating across North America…

Friday, March 21, 2014

The Mystery of Jade Dernbach

Here is a link to my first piece for England cricket fans' blog 'The Full Toss', an excellent and very funny site previously described by Andrew Flintoff as 'a bit of a belter'.

Monday, March 17, 2014

Debut proves we should not write Defoe off just yet

Here is a link to my piece for the World in Sport website explaining why Jermain Defoe's debut for Toronto FC shows he still has much to offer England.

Friday, March 14, 2014

The Cheltenham Festival 2014, and My Great Epiphany

For probably only the third or fourth year in a quarter of a century, there was no Higgs family representative at the Cheltenham Festival this week, horse racing's ultimate celebration. Less of a national tradition than the Grand National, less of a lottery, and treated with much greater reverence by the racing community, the Cheltenham Festival is a brilliant celebration of sport, risk, bravery and, of course, the horses themselves. I made my first trip last year, getting a real taste for the experience, but, obviously, I am in Canada this year, so have been reduced to following it via Internet streams and social media.

As I wrote last year, I have a passionate attachment to the Cheltenham Festival that transcends the sport itself, and, as such, my interest in the sport, with Springtime revealing itself in all its glory over Prestbury Park this week, may appear the ultimate fair-weather indulgence. Indeed, judging by social media, for many of us, horse racing is something we indulge ourselves in three or four times a year, but that's not to denigrate its value as a sport. Surely, therein lies the joy of a festival, in the coming-together and culmination of the racing calendar. After all, you don't have to visit six or seven music festivals a year to appreciate the value of Glastonbury or Woodstock.

Cheltenham comes but once a year, and prior to this week, I felt rather annoyed and upset that I'd be reduced to an expatriate bystander this time around. Following it in North America was never going to be quite the same as living and breathing the Festival, and furthermore, 'Horse racing in Canada' is reduced to a quarter of a page on Wikipedia.

As it happens, social media has proved more than adequate in following 'the Greatest Show on Turf'. With no access to The Racing Post over here, Twitter has revealed itself to be the best vehicle for betting tips and finding the value. Awash with names and numbers every morning, it's been thoroughly enjoyable to filter out and follow where the money is, and who is, or at least purports to be, 'in the know'.

Last year, perhaps overwhelmed with my first experience of the Festival, I went a bit gung-ho and scatter-gun, having at least a look at the odds of every race, and more than often not, putting something on it. This year, I started off with a fiver, and, have been far more savvy, knowing I had to, at the very least, make it last until the showpiece event, Friday's Gold Cup.

It's been a wonderful festival. As I said, I've obviously had to rely on Internet streams (the ultimate frustration, particularly when your horse is set to jump the last fence and the whole thing cuts out), and often I've had to filter through the blogs and articles first thing in the morning due to the time difference, which has made for interesting reading. It's a time of final papers and mid-terms, but there's no way you can just let Cheltenham Festival week slip by without so much as a neigh or a whinny.

They say the two things you need to be a successful gambler are a voracious appetite for statistics, and a complete dispassionateness. Tuesday was all about the Champion Hurdle, and, more out of loyalty from my relatively big win last year, I backed Hurricane Fly for one last hurrah. Loyalty, eh. What was that about dispassionateness? Not much loyalty or indeed dispassionateness flying round when it ambles home in 4th position.

That race, of course, will be overshadowed by the death of Our Conor. It's sad when any horse dies, but when it's one that you've heard of, and, running in such a prestigious race, even someone with no knowledge can see he was obviously a brilliant horse.

My photo from last year
There's been many fantastic pieces written on the constant reminders of the mortality of sport in recent days, and I can't do it justice. But as one horse was tragically being put down, another, almost simultaneously, was reminding us of the emotions of this and indeed almost any other sport, the ups and the downs, the highs and the lows. The brilliant, unstoppable mare Quevega rescued most of us from a loss on Day One, whilst showing us that whilst sport can be tragic, moments of rousing joy are never far from the horizon. And what a horizon. Prestbury Park, in the shadow of the Cotswold Hills.

Day Two was a reminder of the democracy of horse racing. The Queen Mother Champion Chase all about Sprinter Sacre last year, a horse that seemed invincible, but one that had to sit this year's race out, following evidence of an irregular heartbeat. There's that chilling sense of mortality once again. The victory went to Sire De Grugy, a remarkable horse with a pleasantly unremarkable owner.

There's a temptation to think of horse racing as being in two distinct camps- those on the inside, the owners and the trainers, with the riches and the control, and those on the outside, the punters and the gamblers. And yet one of the hottest properties in the sport right now is owned by a businessman from Runcorn, who received Sire De Grugy as a birthday present. It's his only horse. And what a horse. Sire De Grugy, winning the Queen Mother Champion Chase, in that brilliant shadow of the Cotswold Hills.

Day Three, from where I was sat, ended up being positioned as all about the jockeys. There are so many things in sport that are up for debate simply within my own simple mind, and yet curiously, I have no doubt that AP McCoy is the most admirable sportsman in the world. He risks his life four or five times a day, makes incredible sacrifices to remain at a manageable weight for a jockey, and yet more than 4000 winning races later, still has the desire to continue. JT McNamara, who fell at last year's Festival, is still paralysed, and this is the reminder of the perils of the job, and the shadow that hangs over the Cotswold Hills, for the fellow jockeys at least.

My photo from last year
And yet Wednesday was the reminder that even the best can prove themselves fallible. McCoy eschewed the chance to ride More of That in the Ladbrokes World Hurdle, and instead chose At Fishers Cross. At Fishers Cross came a very credible third; More of That romped home to victory. Jockeys appear to be some of the most pragmatic people around. Indeed, it was simply one of those things. They also appear some of the most genuine people around, forever congratulating one another, accepting the rough and the smooth as exactly that- part of the job.

This was why it was so infuriating to read how Ruby Walsh, the most successful Cheltenham jockey of all time, was hung out to dry by animal rights activists this week. Walsh has been painted as having shrugged off the death of Our Conor as being less important than the death of a human- a ridiculous portrayal. Walsh showed pragmatism and perspective, and, yes, perhaps, a natural sporting coldness and detachment. However with his buddy and fellow jockey Jason Maguire having suffered a fall on Monday, and the aforementioned McNamara still in hospital, Walsh was right- there is a huge difference between the death of an animal and the death of a human.


Day Four- and I would have to have a really bad day to break even. Alas, as the curtain came down on the Cheltenham Festival, I was, like the Grand Old Duke of York, neither up nor down. The Gold Cup race itself was billed as a duel between Silviniaco Conti and last year's winner Bobs Worth. I simply couldn't split the two, and didn't even bother to look at any other prospects, so left it well alone, and decided to just enjoy the race as a pure sporting spectacle.

As Lord Windermere, the 20/1 shot came home in the tightest of tight finishes, my judgement on the matter was vindicated. But, ye gads, what a race! Two false starts and the tight finish only begin to scratch the surface. Even after it had finished, probably the most dramatic, most gripping sequence of the entire Festival was played out. And it wasn't even on turf. Channel 4 took us inside the stewards' room to hear the jockeys' verdicts on whether Lord Windermere had cut across, and should have his title stripped. Even to my untrained eye, there didn't seem to be a whole lot wrong, and, sure enough, the result stood. A fitting finale to yet another scintillating Cheltenham Festival.

As I spoke about in last year's blog, my Dad found the romance and the stories behind the horses and the jockeys far more appealing than the gambling side of it. That's not me being holier-than-thou on his part, as for most of my youth, I couldn't really understand why. And yet immersing myself in blogs, newspaper articles, and the coverage itself, I began to develop a long-overdue realisation.

My biggest victory this year can't be measured in pounds, shillings and pence. It's been the epiphany that in amongst the tips, false prophets and discarded copies of The Racing Post, my Dad was right. Horse racing is bloody fantastic.

Monday, March 10, 2014

English cricket needs to re-engage with its public- and fast

Hands up who cared that England lost a T20 international yesterday?

Better still, hands up who knew?

Buried under some pulsating Six Nations rugby, the FA Cup quarter-finals and the Winter Paralympics, English cricket's rudderless ship spluttered and coughed to yet another underwhelming defeat that was so generically 'England 2013-14' that one might have assumed Sky had put the wrong tape in.

That is, of course, if anyone had actually been watching.

To describe the situation as 'rudderless' is not strictly true, of course. Ashley Giles is the limited overs coach, a degree of continuity in an otherwise perplexing winter. But even he must be wondering what he will be doing in a month's time. Whilst Giles is widely-tipped, the England and Wales Cricket Board remain tight-lipped. We mustn't be told what's going on. That's the law of the beaks.

Despite what Giles and the ECB claim, the upcoming ICC World T20 in Bangladesh is a job interview for 'the King of Spain', even on some level. In the ECB's ever-diplomatic minds, to proclaim it as such would be to disrespect a tournament that England won four years ago- and heaven forbid England might disrespect a competition. After all, they were that enamoured with the prospect of some one-day internationals in the West Indies that they failed to send out a proper squad, instead treating that as a warm-up for the warm-ups for the job intervie- sorry, ICC World T20.

Nobody knows when the ECB are going to move on and appoint a new Head Coach. Least of all themselves, it seems. You'd have thought that they, most of all, would want to draw a line under this winter forever, and focus on the future. They love that sort of Orwellian double-speak of 'skillsets' and 'Brave New Worlds'. At the moment, the ECB's version of a Brave New World seems more like dystopia.

First we had the self-flagellation of the Ashes, then that didn't prove cathartic enough, so we had the KP-flagellation, tarred and feathered in front of the nation. Enough of the martyrdom- it's time for rejuvenation.
The ECB en route to the West Indies

Obviously the best way to do that is to win the ICC World T20, but that's about as likely as me winning Miss World. Even plain, simple, old-fashioned victories in summer test series against India and Sri Lanka may not be enough. Victories against both will be met with the caveat of home advantage- India in particular are awful away from the sub-continent.

No. What England needs is an overhauling of the brand. (The ECB would love that sort of business-speak, perhaps they should hire me?) Exciting, attacking victories. Certain pundits would perhaps rightly suggest that this should rule Giles out of the running, given his links to the previous regime, but frankly, the way the ECB has presented itself recently, one gets the impression you could place Ricky Ponting in charge and he'd have been turned into a faceless establishment void in a branded tracksuit within a week.

England test cricket fans are as loyal as any around, certainly when it comes to forking out money year after year. But blind loyalty is only so much of a justification when it comes to paying upwards of £60 for a day at the cricket. Test cricket is a hard sell in a World Cup year anyway, and, added to the fact we've just been battered 5-0 in an Ashes series and the most exciting player has been made persona non grata, again, it's a wonder that the ECB haven't been seen to be pushing things forward.

To begin with, England need to stop playing with hang-dog expressions. They're at risk, rightly or wrongly, of occupying the same dubious place in the public's hearts as the England football team following a World Cup debacle- we're giving them great support despite ourselves, and giving off the sense that did they not come under the banner of 'England', there's nothing we'd like more than to tell them a few home truths.
Alastair Cook looking sad- (Philip Brown/Reuters)

Even if Ashley Giles is appointed as the steady hand on the tiller, then his brand of cricket cannot, must not emerge as steady. Despite crowds falling elsewhere and 'the Big Three' of the ECB, Cricket Australia (CA) and the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) carving the sport up amongst themselves, test cricket is hugely exciting at the moment. This current Australia team could well emerge as just as exciting as the machine of the 1990s, and with big characters retiring left right and centre, it's an opportunity for new players to become the icons of the game. England need to be part of this hostile conversation, or risk being left behind by Australia and South Africa on the field, whilst the ECB gorge themselves off it. That would not be a palatable state of affairs for the paying public.

Whilst nobody wants to see a return to the revolving-door selection policy of just over a decade ago, whereby one bad innings brought trial-by-media and, invariably, your name scrubbed off the team-sheet, the selectors need to be seen to be engaging with the public, and using county cricket. Why not use a little bit of populism and give the people what they want? There are promising signs- Ben Stokes, Jos Buttler and Moeen Ali are all names in and around the side. The ECB are quite happy to milk the fans for money- picking an overwhelming crowd favourite would be seen to be brave, and get people back onside.

I'm loathe to bring this up again, but the Kevin Pietersen affair was the complete opposite of the healthy fan-elite conversation that the ECB should be aspiring to: the fans were treated like children of warring parents; whilst Mummy and Daddy smashed up the kitchen and screamed obscenities at one another, we were locked in our bedrooms only to be told that it doesn't concern us when we asked if they still loved one another.
Artist's impression of the KP and ECB affair

Whilst we're at it, why not drop a few as well? I saw something on Twitter yesterday that suggested that in decades to come, everyone will assume that ODI records are fraudulent, as there's no way that Jade Dernbach could have accrued so many caps. English cricket fans will not create pathetic petitions like the so-called 'football fans' who want Tom Cleverley out of the side- and, whilst we're at it, I'm willing to bet that at least half of those signatures have never been to a football match- but I'm not sure the clamour for Dernbach to be left out of the side is too wide of the mark. That's not populism- that's common sense. This isn't a witch-hunt against Dernbach by the way. Plenty of others should be nervously shifting their gear from their ECB-branded kit-bags to their County Championship vessels.

English cricket is overwhelmingly more healthy than when Andy Flower arrived, but somewhere in amongst the quinoa and the statistics, a sense of fun has been lost. Andrew Flintoff might not be everyone's cup of tea, but a recent interview alluded to this, and Freddie was nothing if not fun. A figure of fun? Maybe towards the end, but he brought the crowds in and engaged with the public like nobody else (apart from you-know-who), and that is what is needed at this time.

The good ship ECB can use us fans as a raft to carry them out of stormy waters. Just be wary that even the best rafts can collapse.